Lincoln-Douglas debate (LD) is a unique form of debate focusing on ethical and philosophical arguments. Unlike policy debate, LD doesn't involve plans or specific policy proposals. Instead, debaters grapple with complex value-based resolutions, exploring the moral implications of various perspectives. A typical LD round consists of a constructive speech where each debater presents their case, followed by rebuttals and cross-examination periods. The resolution, which changes frequently, serves as the central theme, providing a framework for debating competing values and principles. Success in LD hinges on strong argumentation, ethical reasoning, and effective communication. Debaters must develop sophisticated arguments, justify their values, and effectively refute opposing viewpoints. It's a challenging format that emphasizes critical thinking, persuasive speaking, and a deep understanding of ethical theory.
What is the primary focus of argumentation in Lincoln-Douglas Debate?
How does Lincoln-Douglas Debate differ from other debate formats, such as Policy Debate?
What is the role of the resolution in a Lincoln-Douglas Debate round?
Previous
Next